TopTable_r1_c1: Building Community Excellence Site Link
General District Information Business Services Human Resources Operations and Maintenance Purchasing Services Foothill-De Anza District Foundation Technology Services Research Services
Foothill De Anza
leftcurve1:
leftcurve2:  
   
Fast Answers  
faqs Finding a job Employee QuickHelp Doing Business Community Interest  
 
 

  ETAC Committee

December 4, 2003 Minutes

 

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY
COMMITTEE

12/04/2003, 9:00-10:30 pm

ATTENDEES: Carole Chapman, Kim Chief Elk, Tom Dolen, Jamie Doll, Dave Gillett, Scott Heffner, William Le, Allison Lenkeit, Willie Pritchard, John Swensson

GUESTS: Gerry Gyuire, Sharon Luciw

Convened: 9:02 am

1. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

· The minutes will stand approved as posted.

2. GENERAL NEWS - TECH USE SURVEY

· Tech Use Survey

The survey came out on Monday, November 24th

The current response rate to the survey, as of this morning, is a little lower than usual

Would appreciate ETAC members reminding their constituency groups to respond to the survey

ETS values the input from the survey, which helps in our program review data; informs us about what the needs and desires are of our user community, as well as informs us of areas we can improve

The survey will come off line, a week from Friday (December 12th)

A reminder notice will be sent out on Monday, December 8th

3. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS - HARDWARE/SOFTWARE STANDARDS, NETWORK & SYSTEMS, INFORMATION SYSTEMS

· Hardware /Software Standards -Willie Pritchard

The committee was supposed to meet this past Tuesday - was cancelled due to illness

The next meeting is scheduled for January 6th, 2004

· Network & Systems - Sharon Luciw

No update

 

· Information Systems - Gerry Gyuire

No update

The committee will be meeting on December 18th

4. STRATEGIC PLAN ? DEVELOP A PLAN OF ACTION FOR REVISION

· 1996 Willie & Penny Patz were ask by the Chancellor to come up with a strategic plan for the district

They put together a plan based upon meetings with individual divisions, deans, managers, groups of faculty, the senates, etc

The plan was adopted by the Board in June of '96

Used to guide a lot of the decision making regarding technology until about '99

· In '99 an outside consulting group (Collegis) was called in to help manage the technology support of the District and help design a new strategic plan for the District

This is the document the District currently is working under

There were objections to the strategies and goals, at the end of the document, and were brought before the Board

In light of the objections that were heard, ETAC was charged with revising the strategies and goals to meet the over all goals of the District

ETAC decided to not substantially change the text of the strategic plan itself but to change the strategies and goals

The goals with associated strategies were what the District was supposed to work towards, in particular ETS

· Since the plan is normally revised every four years and due to the changes in technology and our budget environment, it is imperative to look at the current document for revisions to meet our changing environment

· John Swensson suggested that the document is looked at from the big picture point of view

Need to look at a new admin system

Technology training is a big issue to look at

The wireless issue needs to be addressed in the plan

Would like ETUDES to become ubiquitous

Need a good SPAM filter

The issue of computer replacement needs to be addressed

The comment was made that these are all tactical issues not strategic issues - strategies to implement the goal

Can be used as the strategy for creating the larger goals

· The current task is to look at the larger goals and see if they need to be changed and then look at the strategies for implementing those goals

· Jamie Doll expressed the fact that there is no mention of security in the current goals and feels that it should be broken out as a separate goal

·Allison Lenkeit is concerned with the wording of the Mission Statement because the goals didnÕt focus on how technology would be used to improve student outcomes or teaching

· Scott Heffner expressed the concern that some faculty feel that technology needs to be an option and not forced on faculty

· Need to come up with a strategy for modifying the Strategic Plan

· Willie would like to take a new or revised plan to the Board in June

· Willie can come to the next meeting with a proposal of how to proceed

The first step is to look at the current goals to see if they need to be changed

Need to set time limits on how to proceed

· Some of the current goals have already been worked on, or have been completed

· The Strategic Plan will go from ETAC to the Round Table/College Council for input and then to the CAC and finally to the Board

Constituency groups also need to be made aware that ETAC is working on the Strategic Plan

Would need to have a completed plan by April in order to go to the Board by June

· John Swensson would like to work on the Strategic Plan during the summer and have it ready for the fall

Feels that faculty are overloaded with work at this time

Faculty contracts run September thru June - working through the summer would be a contract issue

· The Strategic Plan is a far-reaching plan that will take us through the next three or four years and takes into consideration the current budget constraints

5. OTHER ITEMS FROM THE COMMITTEE

· 12/17/03 meeting will be rescheduled

Meeting needs to be at the beginning or the end of the day to avoid so much commuting

Adjourned: 10:30 am 

Next Meeting: Wednesday, December 17, 3:30 - 5:00 pm, Foothill Carriage House Conference Room

 
 

 

Last Updated: Monday, December 15, 2003 at 3:00:10 PM
©2010 Foothill-De Anza Community College District

 
Home Foothill De Anza
 About Us Business Human Resources Facilities Purchasing Foundation Technology Research
Home