EDUCATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
4/24/2003, 9:00-10:30 am
ATTENDEES: Carole Chapman,
Wayne Chenoweth, Jennifer De Leon, Scott Heffner, Chuck Lindauer, Greg McIlhiney,
Willie Pritchard, Jaci Ward
GUESTS:
Sharon Luciw, Cindy Vinson
Convened:
9:07 am
1.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING
·
There was a request, by Scott Heffner, for the addition of the following statement
to topic number 4 of the April 10th meeting minutes:
Question(s)
concerns were raised that it may be premature to state definitively, how
wide dissemination efforts will need to be, without first, establishing
what EIT products will appear as compliant on the Standards List.
2.
GENERAL NEWS – NEXT NEWSBYTES WILL COME OUT ON APRIL 28, TOPIC TO BE
ABOUT THE DISTRICT NETWORK; ETS EFFORTS TO ENSURE STABILITY; TYPES OF OUTAGES
WE EXPERIENCE
·
NewsBytes will be sent out this coming Monday
Sharon is putting
together some material regarding the district network
There will be
a FAQ that addresses the issue of Mac users sending e-mail attachments to
PC users in a format that the PC cannot read, and how to correct this problem
3.
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS – HARDWARE/SOFTWARE STANDARDS, NETWORK & SYSTEMS,
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, COMPUTER USE POLICY
·
Network & Systems – Sharon Luciw
Met and talked
more about security
Security policy
will be a combination of other security policies
·
Hardware & Software Standards - Willie
Met last week, April 15th
Discussed the configurations
of special purpose systems - the hi-end desk top machines
There
was some concern that they may not be configured high enough
After
looking at the Dell side, could not have configured much higher, except by
adding more ram
The
current system was reconfigured by reducing the current 640MB to 512MB of
RAM and making it a single dimm, to allow for a free dimm and thus more expandability
without losing other RAM
Saved
money by the reconfiguration
Looked
at laptops, but only on the MAC side, and changed it
Holding
off on the PC laptop side until new technology comes out
There
have been questions raised by a variety of people, around the district - why
inexpensive clones cannot be purchased instead of the standards
Clones
are built with lesser quality equipment and you end up having more problems
and in the end, costs more
Chuck
Lindauer confirmed this observation
There
was some discussion about upgrading to Windows XP
The
committee will hold off on this discussion for a while
There
was some discussion about the need to continue using zip drives as backup
The
committee decided to continue to the use of zips drives
There was some
discussion on shareware software, especially for compressing and decompressing
files
Will have
to do a survey to see how many Win Zip people are out there
Need to close
the legal loophole that could exist
·
Instructional Technology – Cindy Vinson
No update
Cindy
is organizing a Manila user work group for faculty
The work group
will be held on Friday, May 16th, from 1:00 –2:30 pm
in the Don Bautista Room
·
Information Systems – Gerry Gyuire
No update
The committee is scheduled
to meet next week
They have been
working on a data security policy
·
Appropriate Use Committee
Policy has been
approved by CAC with qualifications from certain constituency groups (FA
& SCIU)
Willie has
been trying to have discussions with both groups about the issues they
still have
The policy was
presented to the Board at their last meeting
There were three
issues raised at the Board meeting
1) FH Academic
Senate’s issue had to do with the definition of pornography.
They felt that obscene pornography had to be called out specifically (they
want the word obscene in front of the word pornography)
2) FA had
a concern with the third paragraph of the policy where it states that
the entire District network> & all hw & sw components within
it, is the sole property of the District and that the District retains
complete and sole authority over the terms and conditions of its use
The position
of the district is that, although it is important to protect against
search & seizure, since they own the network, the district needs
to have the right to stop abuse of it
After CAC,
Willie proposed that there not be a modification to the Board policy,
but that ETS put forward a policy that says under what condition, ETS
will be doing monitoring
Since FA,
SEIU and the Academic Senate still have objections to Willie’s
proposed procedure for ETS, as a process, another approach is being
worked on
ETS does
not monitor e-mail, it monitors the network for performance. ETS
does not know what is going through the network, until there is a problem,
such as a stoppage or slowdown of the network. Then and only then does
ETS start to do something.
90-95% of
the time, there is a denial of service attack; a virus problem or someone
is downloading humongous files
3) Instead
of saying that there is no expectation of privacy, it should read that
there should be some expectation of security
ETS is currently
working on a security policy, but it is not in place and ready to go
at this time
The policy is
due for a vote at the next Board meeting on May 5th
4. UPDATE ON POLICY FOR ELECTRONIC
AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS – WAYNE CHENOWETH
·
According to the districts’ attorney, section 508, does not need to
be a board policy
District legal
has been in touch with Ralph Black (legal counsel for the State Chancellors
Office) about whether there was a need for a board policy
According to
Black, the district needs to implement procedures or a methodology for ensuring
compliance with section 508, but not a policy
· A question was
raised about the difference between Board Policy and District Policy as
mentioned in the minutes from the April 10th meeting
A Board Policy
has legal ramifications
A District Policy
is more of a procedure - how policies are implemented, and how legal requirements
are going to be met
Could be call
an administrative procedure
·
Section 508 will not go through the same governance procedures as the Computer
Use Policy
·
We will need to work out what the procedures are for how we are going to make
our best attempt to comply with this law
·
Will need to identify a compliance officer who will be responsible for enforcing
the law as it has been interpreted
·
The committee has not met, but is scheduled to meet next Thursday at 9:00
am, in the De Anza Admin Conference RM
Will address
the procedures
·
This policy only applies to new purchases
It applies to
purchases of hardware as well as software
·
Wayne handed out two procedure flow charts for section 508
One chart was
an example from the US Treasury department
The other chart
was the process flow developed at the last ETAC meeting
The committee
reviewed the processes
A suggestion
was raised to add the additional process of attaching documentation to a
PR if a product is 100% VPAT compliant so the purchasing agent knows that
the item is compliant
Need some description
of what an alternative will be, to explain how exceptions will be handled
· New web
pages need to be 508 compliant
·
When checking for a product compliance, should start with the Federal site
·
The committee has started a web site
·
When someone does research, they should share it with others
Wayne will see
if the High Tech Center will come up with a compliance list
·
At the next meeting, the committee will address issues that came up as well
as do a pilot on buying a product
·
Will do a story about section 508 in the May 12th issue of NewsBytes
5. OTHER ITEMS FROM THE
COMMITTEE
·
ETS has an employee dedicated to Measure E projects – Daniel Ybarra
·
Network status is posted as events occur, during the normal operating hours
of the Call Center
Current operating
hours of the Call Center are:
7:00 am –
7:00 pm Monday – Thursday
7:00 am –
5:00 pm Fridays
Adjourned:
10:25 am
Next Meeting:
May 8, 2003, 9:00 am, De Anza Admin Conference Room
|